🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our children's youth". A law is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked the legislature to enact a law lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a useful starting point," stated the parliamentarian behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the family of a young person who died after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and fit for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, action is largely happening at the local government level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring parental consent for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some politicians to follow the Australian example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Apart from these regions, other states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

As this global debate unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and others show that states globally are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.